http://goo.gl/l5uMoc more often than not i find that i'm not
Geeky Tumblr Themes
Next Page

more often than not i find that i'm not


violetglass:

if you refer to a child as a “walking abortion,” you are fucking disgusting. you cannot blame tokophobia or pedophobia. you are just tacky and gross and i feel for any mother or her kids who might ever have to be in your presence. you can call yourself a feminist but what kind…

luaren:

Honestly can’t wait for the 50 shades movie to normalize the manipulation of lower-level female employees. Can’t wait for the new wave of “consent is sexy” banners on the cover of cosmo. Can’t wait for teen girls to think that a controlling relationship is romantic. Can’t wait for sexualized violence to become increasingly mainstream. And most of all, I can’t wait for BDSM to be labeled a feminist revolution.





halftheskymovement:

In an article for Take Part, writers Holly Eagleson and Lauren Wade retouched controversial advertisements by replacing women models with men. In doing so, Eagleson and Wade hoped to highlight the pervasiveness of sexual objectification of women. For example, they decided to remake American Apparel advertisements to draw attention to former CEO Dov Charney’s abuse and mistreatment of female employees, as well as to photographer Terry Richardson’s record of harassing and assaulting women.

Charney and Richardson are really representative of a specific form of sexism and objectification in media today,” Wade told Huffington Post in an email. “Their collaborations, in particular for American Apparel, depict women in sexually vulnerable, pornographic positions where a lot of the model’s facial expressions look like they’ve been drugged or they’re drunk. These images are predatory. They depict women being taken advantage of and it’s supposed to look “sexy” and sell sweatshirts?”


dlow19 Asked:
How is porn damaging my brain

My answer:

randomstabbing:

stfutransactivistbullies:

radicalblossoming:

skepticalactivism:

radicalblossoming:

skepticalactivism:

stfutransactivistbullies:

radicalblossoming:

aohq:

radicalblossoming:

at only 16 years old, with a brain not fully developed until you’re around 22….

it’s giving you unrealistic representations of what sex is or is supposed to be, it’s giving you false information about the dangers of unprotected sex, it’s giving you violent representation of how men should treat women during sex, it’s sexualizing violence, it’s sexualizing degradation, it’s not an accurate depiction of sex between consenting adults, it’s not an accurate representation of how sex works between adults, it’s creating a false expectation of what women want or like or need during sex, it prioritizes men’s pleasure and gratification only, it doesn’t give any weight to the kind of sexual attention women typically need to achieve orgasm and have a fulfilling experience. the porn you’re watching could be a rape. you could be witnessing a woman being raped. that’s pretty damaging.

How, precisely, is any of that damage to the brain?

That is, it is possibly damaging to one’s psyche, but that, in and of itself, is not concomitant with damage to the brain. None of what you describe is damage to the brain.

So how is it damage to the brain, the organ that houses the electrochemical reactions that are the methodology of storing all of what you describe?

I mean with all the evidence about porn and how it impacts people you’re going to only pick at semantics about the use of the word “brain” by the 16 year old OP who probably was limited in his understanding of psyche vs literal brain matter and so chose the word “brain”? THAT is your issue here? You know perfectly well what OP was asking and what I was replying.

Porn consumption LITERALLY affects and ALTERS the brain physically.  In males it’s been found to affect their gray matter, as well as the parts of the brain that influence motivation and empathy, especially empathy for women.  Studies have shown repeatedly that young males who regularly consume porn grow up to be more aggressive, more hostile, more violent, they become more impulsive, more reckless, take more sexual risks AND are more likely to rape.  Porn literally re-writes the wiring in the brain, and since the brains of young males are still developing, porn changes their brain development. 

  Studies have shown” yet you don’t provide any.

Back up your statement cause it’s 100% BULLSHIT.

considering you are capable of reblogging and adding pointless commentary im going to assume you also know how to use google as well. here. i’ll teach u just in case!

highlght and copy “why is porn damaging”

and then go to the google and paste and b sure to click search.

good luck!!!!

When you state “Studies have shown” you have a morial responsibility to your followers to provide those studies not bury your head in the sand and tell people that call you out to just “google it.”

I’ll play your game. A 2006 research paper has provided evidence that incidences of rape in the United States has declined 85% in the past 25 years while access to pornography has become freely available to teenagers and adults. The Nixon and Reagan Commissions tried to show that exposure to pornographic materials produced social violence. The reverse may be true: that pornography has reduced social violence.

Here’s a article that says porn is good, for both people and society. Here’s another from a psychology website that says porn is good. 

Couples that watch porn are happier and have better relationships.

Your move.

I don’t have any responsibility to anyone?????? I have no “moral responsibility” to you. I have a life. I have shit to do. I don’t have time to educate you on everything when no one educated me. I have to research and read and discover constantly. No one hands it to me.

Also I am not the person who said “studies have shown” so maybe don’t yell at me about it?

but i’ll bite anyway and provide you with a handful of links because you’re a lazy shit

I provided links yesterday, but whatever.  Porn freaks love their addiction.

DO NOT DATE OR FUCK PORN USERS> THEY ARE SHIT.



"The reality is that fat people are often supported in hating their bodies, in starving themselves, in engaging in unsafe exercise, and in seeking out weight loss by any means necessary. A thin person who does these things is considered mentally ill. A fat person who does these things is redeemed by them. This is why our culture has no concept of a fat person who also has an eating disorder. If you’re fat, it’s not an eating disorder — it’s a lifestyle change."

Lesley Kinzel  (via romantickissing)


neverlaur:

neverlaur:

bowlingforwhoop:

neverlaur:

So my Dad and brother took separate cars to dinner tonight, and this happened.

they look like they are arguing about who is going to go home and change

Oh, they were.

Jake: You’ve got to be kidding me
Dad: You SAW me walk through the kitchen on my way to pick up your sister!
Jake: No seriously do you have an extra shirt in your car this is ridiculous

Oh my god they’re gonna kill me they didn’t want to even walk into the restaurant together let alone have this many people reblog this photo


dekutree:

mangoshawty:

reallylameblog:

dekutree:

if you were to become the president of the world, what is the first law you would pass?

Execute The Furries

*growls angrily and raises tail in caution*

image




blackhaireverywhere:

crimsong19:

consultingpiskies:

Jessica Williams speaks with Sgt. Jasmine Jacobs about Army regulation AR 670-1

Jessica Williams and Travon (one of the staff writers) do it again!

This is why white women can’t be in the natural hair movement



If we could be measured we might be finite. Instead we must bear the burden of endless possibility. Rebecca, 21





Powered By: Tumblr Themes | Facebook Covers